FCA costs must fall before cheaper advice models can emerge, says APFA

clock

Advisers will find it difficult to develop much-needed cheaper advice models until the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) lowers its costs, the Association of Professional Financial Advisers (APFA) has said.

The trade body has published research echoing its findings from last year: some advisers are turning away clients because they feel their requirements do "not justify the cost" of their service.

Some 37% of advisers who had turned away a client did so for this reason, according to an APFA survey of more than 230 advisers carried out in January.

APFA said the findings show the industry needs to develop "viable but lower cost" advice options, but that the FCA must first lower its costs on advisers, such as by overhauling its allocation of fees and further simplifying firms' reporting duties.

Earlier this month, the FCA proposed that firms would only need to complete section K of the Retail Mediation Activities Return (RMAR) once annually, rather than the current twice-per-year.

"The FCA's recent proposals to simplify RMAR reporting are a welcome step in the right direction", APFA stated in its report Accessing advice: Providing viable options for consumers.

"[But] we need to see the regulator doing everything it can to streamline bureaucracy, so that the cost to advisers of giving advice is minimised,"

Developing lower-cost advice solutions presents both a challenge and an opportunity, it added.

Remember 'focused' advice?

It said its survey suggested some advisers were already offering 'simplified' advice to clients, even though others remained unsure about what the term meant. APFA suggested 'focused' advice, which the FCA does distinguish from simplified advice, was a "vital consideration" for many advisers.

According to its final guidance on simplified advice, published in 2012, the key difference between focused advice and simplified advice is that the former involves the client stipulating the boundaries of the service they wish to receive.

The latter, on the other hand, describes streamlined advice processes delivered face-to-face, over the phone or online which aim to address "straightforward" needs of consumers. It will relate to one or more specific needs, with no analysis carried out on anything else, and "may" result in a product recommendation, according to the guidance.

 

More on Regulation

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

£6.65bn for the year

Cameron Roberts
clock 20 December 2024 • 2 min read
Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Risking regulatory action

Cameron Roberts
clock 17 December 2024 • 2 min read
FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

Focus on data quality

Cameron Roberts
clock 12 December 2024 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read