Protection shortfall fears for employers as DB schemes close

clock

Employers closing Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes should revisit their sickness provision to avoid a costly ‘protection gap', warns Group Risk Development (GRiD.)

Research from the trade body found over a third (35%) of employers are still considering the issue of how to manage ill-health early retirement provision when closing a DB scheme.

Currently an employer operating a DB scheme may use ill-health early retirement as an option if an employee develops a condition requiring a long period of sick leave.

With many DB schemes closing to new members or for future accrual for existing members, a significant number of employers are unsure about the impact this could have on corporate sickness policy.

According to GRiD's research, almost one in five employers (19%) has claimed their employees will still be able to take enhanced ill health early retirement under the closed pension scheme, while 17% of employers have replicated this provision through an insurance policy.

Meanwhile, over a third (35%) are still unsure about how to manage this issue and a fifth (20%) admit to have overlooked the issue. However, should the scheme close, alternative provision needs to be made if employers are to avoid a costly protection gap.

Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD (pictured), said: "It is important for employers and employees to remember that DB schemes are not just about a pension - they can have other associated benefits. Closing or revising a DB scheme has clear implications for corporate pension policy but it can also leave a hole in a company's health and sickness provision which shouldn't be ignored.

"So when closing a DB scheme it's vital for employers to revisit their sickness provision to ensure it remains robust enough to protect their business and their employees. Worryingly our study suggests that many employers are unsure how best to do this.

"Implementing a Group Income Protection (GIP) policy where employers offer staff access to insured protection cover if injury or illness prevents them from working for a prolonged period could be an option."

More on Income Protection

Partner Insight: How prepared is your client for the unexpected?

Partner Insight: How prepared is your client for the unexpected?

Mike Farrell, Protection Sales and Marketing Director at LV= discusses some of the findings of their second Reaching Resilience report

Mike Farrell, Protection Sales and Marketing Director at LV=
clock 04 November 2024 • 3 min read
Partner Insight: Why real stories matter in protection conversations

Partner Insight: Why real stories matter in protection conversations

Mike Farrell, Director of Protection Sales and Marketing, LV=
clock 07 October 2024 • 3 min read
IPTF partners with MIMHC

IPTF partners with MIMHC

Focus on mental health

Cameron Roberts
clock 14 August 2024 • 1 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read