Providers to part-fund advisers' FSCS costs in FSA u-turn

Scott Sinclair
clock

Providers including banks and insurance companies may be forced to part-fund compensation costs sparked by the failure of intermediaries, after the Financial Services Authority (FSA) re-drafted proposals on funding the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

Originally, large compensation costs arising from the failure of an intermediary business would have been mostly paid for by other intermediaries via a ‘retail pool'.

The pool - triggered once a funding class compensation threshold (currently £100m for investment advisory firms) is breached - would have been funded by intermediaries and investment providers only.

However, re-drafted proposals suggest all provider firms regulated by both the incoming Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) should have to contribute also.

The FSA said this is because all firms subject to FCA regulation will have a "mutual financial interest" in maintaining the confidence of consumers who use the markets in which they operate. It acknowledged this "undermined the exclusion of product providers from the FCA retail pool".

The FSA first published a review of the funding arrangements of the FSCS in July last year. Its aim is to "establish a credible funding approach for the FSCS, one which balances the need for adequacy of funds with affordability for those contributing".

Chris Hannant, policy director at the Association of Professional Financial Advisers, said it was important product providers retained some responsibility for their products.

However, there was some bad news for intermediaries: the FSA said it would take forward its proposal to increase the investment intermediation sub-class threshold from £100m to £150m.

Hannant said: "We are disappointed that the FSA hasn't announced a more sensible threshold for investment intermediaries. The regulator must recognise that the RDR and the wider economic environment will affect adviser revenues. The lack of revision to the threshold for investment intermediaries is a missed opportunity to build a more stable and affordable funding model."

More on Regulation

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

£6.65bn for the year

Cameron Roberts
clock 20 December 2024 • 2 min read
Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Risking regulatory action

Cameron Roberts
clock 17 December 2024 • 2 min read
FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

Focus on data quality

Cameron Roberts
clock 12 December 2024 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read