feature: The (g)end(er) is nigh

clock • 7 min read

So, what are the knowns and unknowns of the forthcoming Gender and I minus E changes? Mark Jones takes us through a few wrinkles

One particularly interesting clause in the government response document focuses on attempts by insurers to put in place ‘artificial structures’ before G-Day to circumvent the impact of the directive after this date.

It states that any such moves would clearly be contrary to the spirit of the judgment and unlikely to be looked upon favourably by the European Commission or the courts.

No specific remedial action then, but a clear shot across the bows to those contemplating offering ‘creative’ solutions, deals or promises.  While there will be some price winners from Gender, these are likely to be largely offset by I minus E.

The net result? For most, but not everyone, the cost of protection will be going up in 2013. In fact, the only group of people who are set to be clear winners from the changes will be women who want to buy income protection

Gender has and will enjoy plenty of column inches, but only in the trade press. Yet it is imperative to flag the importance of I minus E too. If you have missed it, here is a very quick ‘grab ’n’ go’ explanation.

The ‘I-E’ (investment income and chargeable gains minus expenses) taxation regime currently allows insurance companies to offset the costs of their life insurance business against their investment income (for example with profits business).

This is being removed at the end of 2012. It will result in some insurance companies paying more tax, thereby increasing costs and inevitably leading to higher prices for their customers.

In March 2012, the Actuarial Profession indicated the taxation change could lead to an increase in new life and critical illness premiums (as most critical illness is combined with life cover) of around 10%. This I-E tax regime does not affect income protection.

However, not all providers are impacted to the same level, as they will have varying amounts of investment income available to them. An argument in favour of the change is it will remove a barrier to entry, as currently a new entrant into the market without an investment back book is at a competitive disadvantage.

So how much will prices change? Whatever average figures LV= or others use, we can guarantee that they will not apply to your client. There are so many factors affecting premiums that it is impossible to give a single definitive figure that will apply to everyone.

The extent of change will vary by provider, will differ by product class and be determined by the individual circumstances of the client. Added to this, we expect to witness a fair amount of re-pricing activity in early 2013 as providers attempt to get to grips with the new gender neutral world. The table (above, right) gives a rough guide to how we can expect premiums to change across the market in 2013, adding together the effects of Gender and I-E.

More on Regulation

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

IPT receipts hit £1.2bn in November

£6.65bn for the year

Cameron Roberts
clock 20 December 2024 • 2 min read
Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Firms using GDPR as scapegoat for Consumer Duty failures: MorganAsh

Risking regulatory action

Cameron Roberts
clock 17 December 2024 • 2 min read
FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

FCA releases best practices for Consumer Duty board reports

Focus on data quality

Cameron Roberts
clock 12 December 2024 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read