Providers of income protection should allow additional cover for pension contributions, similar to the group income protection and executive income protection, adviser firm Drewberry has urged.
The majority of mainstream income protection insurers only cover 50-60% of gross annual income, the adviser firm highlighted.
Drewberry warned this amount is often just enough to cover a client's essential monthly outgoings but generally doesn't leave enough room to cover the pension contributions a client would need to make during incapacity to survive financially during retirement.
Drewberry suggests that insurers provide an option to cover a specified pension contribution when setting up new income protection plans, in addition to the usual 50-60% for lifestyle protection.
When setting up income protection it is only possible to cover 50 to 60% of gross income with most providers.
As income protection benefit is paid tax free, providers don't allow policyholders to cover 100% of income in order to avoid situations where a client is better off out of work than in work.
Even with income protection covering the maximum allowable (50-60% of gross income) clients still face a significant reduction in take home pay, especially for basic rate taxpayers.
For example (see below), with an insurer that only allows a client to insure up to 55% of their gross income (which is the case with four major income protection insurers), for someone earning £35,000 per annum claiming on their income protection plan would result in a 29% fall in take home pay relative to their normal working wage (amounting to £643 per month).
The reduction in take home pay would be 20% for someone earning £70,000 per annum.
Such large reductions in take home pay mean that it is often only possible to cover a client's essential outgoings such as bills with very little room for outgoings such as pension contributions.
For someone on £36,000 per annum a sensible total pension contribution would need to be around 10% of annual income.
This amounts to £300 a month and this extra amount would often be difficult to cover in full with income protection given the current cover/income limits.
Without being able to save sufficiently for older age it is likely that someone who needs to claim long-term on their income protection policy could face a life of poverty when the policy term ends and payment stop.
Even five years of missed pension contributions can amount to a significant amount in lost pension savings come retirement.
Drewberry gave the example of assuming a net investment growth rate of 5% per annum, if someone missed being able to contribute £300 per month in the 5 years before retirement this could amount to lost retirement savings of around £20,000.
If someone needed to make a long-term income protection claim and missed being able to afford pension contributions of £300 per month for 20 years before retirement, they could have a significant £124,000 less in their pension pot to fund retirement.
Tom Conner, director at Drewberry, said: "Whether a client is working or claiming on their income protection policy, there is still a huge need for them to be able to save sufficiently for retirement.
"For someone that may never be able to go back to work, income protection is their financial lifeline, but what do they do after the policy term ends and their benefit payments stop? Their bills certainly don't stop coming in.
"If income protection providers allowed an additional amount of cover for pension contributions then someone who's unfortunate enough to become long-term incapacitated would still be able to fund life after their income protection policy ends."
