European Court rules insurers need to include economic consequences of policies

clock

Insurers are being warned by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that they must ensure consumers are able to understand the economic consequences of the policy being taken out.

The court decreed that even if the contractual terms given are in plain language, the policyholder must be able to understand using "precise intelligible criteria" the economic consequences of the whole contract.

Failing to do so could leave insurers open to legal action in national courts under unfair terms legislation.

The ECJ's decision came in the case of Jean-Claude Van Hove v CNP Assurances SA, which originated in France.

Mr Van Hove took two out mortgages totalling around €68,000 and protected 75% of the value with a disability insurance contract should he be unable to work.

Following an accident at work, Mr Van Hove was found to have a permanent partial incapacity rate of 72% within the meaning of French social security law.

However, the doctor appointed by the insurance company concluded that Mr Van Hove's state of health, although no longer compatible with him returning to his former post, allowed him to carry on appropriate employment on a part-time basis. The insurer therefore refused to continue to cover the loan repayments.

Van Hove brought legal action claiming the terms relating to total incapacity for work were unfair and the French court referred the matter to the ECJ.

The ECJ agreed that case considering whether the terms were unfair could proceed and returned it back to the French court.

However, it emphasised that because the contracts were co-joined as part of one framework that the "consumer cannot be required to have the same vigilance regarding the extent of the risks covered by that insurance contract as he would if he had concluded the insurance contract and the loan contracts separately".

It added: "The court therefore declares that terms that relate to the main subject-matter of an insurance contract may be regarded as being drafted in plain, intelligible language if they are not only grammatically intelligible to the consumer, but also set out transparently the specific functioning of the insurance arrangements, taking into account the contractual framework of which they form part, so that that consumer is in a position to evaluate, on the basis of precise, intelligible criteria, the economic consequences for him which derive from it.

"If not, the national court may assess the possible unfairness of the term at issue."

More on Insurer

Iress adds Zurich to The Exchange platform

Iress adds Zurich to The Exchange platform

Adopts ex-smoker questions

Jaskeet Briah
clock 24 October 2024 • 1 min read
IFoA names new CEO

IFoA names new CEO

Paul Lewis to take position

Jaskeet Briah
clock 18 October 2024 • 1 min read
L&G updates leadership team

L&G updates leadership team

Laura Mason and Katie Worgan added

Cameron Roberts
clock 16 October 2024 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read